Issue taxonomy

Athena looks for reviewable reporting issues, not just negative items.

A negative account is not automatically inaccurate. Athena identifies patterns that may deserve review, then leaves the final decision with you — what is true, accurate, complete, and worth disputing.

12

Issue categories

FCRA §611

Legal backing per dispute

Your call

Final decision always yours

12 categories

Issue patterns Athena can help classify

Incomplete reportingInconsistent balancesConflicting open, close, delinquency, or last-payment datesUnclear account statusDuplicate collectionsRe-aging concernsPaid accounts still reporting as unpaidIncorrect late paymentsMedical debt reporting concernsIdentity-theft or mixed-file concernsBankruptcy reporting issuesUnverifiable reporting

How it helps

Why the taxonomy matters

Understand before disputing

Helps you see why an item may be worth reviewing — before filing anything.

Focused dispute reasons

Separates issue type from dispute reason so every draft stays specific and FCRA-grounded.

Everything stays connected

Findings attach to evidence, letters, mailing records, responses, and deadlines — in one case file that never lets a non-answer slide.

Know what you're looking at

Every issue type, mapped to the rule it breaks.

A late-pay conflict is not a stale collection is not a stranger's address. Athena classifies each finding by the statute it fails — so every dispute states a specific claim, the kind bureaus have to process instead of dismiss.

View plans

Twelve issue types

One audit finds yours.

Re-aged dates, duplicate collections, phantom balances — whatever is hiding in your report, the audit names it and preps the dispute.